Table of Contents
As blockchain DDoS protection becomes more important, more networks are being attacked by disastrous denial-of-service attacks. The recent high-profile attack on the emerging Manta blockchain damaged the network during a significant token airdrop, exemplifying the devastation that distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks can inflict on cryptocurrency infrastructure.
Unfortunately, the 74% increase in worldwide DDoS attacks in 2023 is driving a larger trend, of which Manta’s situation is a part. Strong blockchain DDoS security is now more important than ever due to attacks’ increasing frequency, length, and complexity.
Research shows that among all industries except banking and telecommunications, blockchain and crypto infrastructure are the most vulnerable to distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks, with over 15 million incidents each year.
Concerns about the potential impact of unchecked assaults on network security, performance, and trust are growing as adoption rates continue to accelerate. Many smaller projects lack the knowledge or funding to implement sufficient safeguards. Newer ecosystems and more established chains can protect their networks from DDoS attacks by implementing the correct measures.
Blockchains can potentially prevent the actions of “blockchain baddies” and disastrous outages by utilizing their advanced monitoring, detection, access control, and other features. While there is no foolproof method of protecting Bitcoin networks from distributed denial of service attacks, a multi-layered defensive strategy can mitigate the impact of the most common types of attacks. Instead of cowering under the threat of distributed denial of service (DDoS) interruption, innovative chains demonstrate that robust blockchain DDoS defense is essential for uninterrupted operation even while under attack.
DDoS Attack Vectors
A volumetric attack aims to overload infrastructure capacity by flooding networks with massive amounts of fake traffic. Criminals flood their targets with unnecessary requests or data packets by using networks of compromised devices, known as botnets. These networks collapse under the weight of bandwidth limits.
For example, in June of 2022, the Solana blockchain experienced a devastating overload of 400 thousand transactions per second. Due to the denial-of-service caused by the excessive transmission volume, block production and confirmation were both made impossible. It was a perfect example of Solana’s vulnerability to simple network flooding caused by large amounts of random traffic.
Additionally, hackers take advantage of holes in the code that allow them to compromise protocols such as blockchain consensus and networking. Attackers can submit legitimately formed requests that demand excessive computational power to process by analyzing protocol rulesets. This takes away resources from nodes to make a DDoS attack happen.
In 2021, another attack like this happened on the SpaceMesh blockchain. Attackers subjected every SpaceMesh node to needless processing, draining CPU cycles en masse by submitting timed workload tasks permitted by large-scale protocol rules. Because there were too many nodes, the network stopped working briefly before experts could fix it.
Application Layer Attacks
DDoS attacks can still impair infrastructure and services at higher levels by attacking the application layer. That includes flooding application programming interfaces (APIs), web interfaces (UIs), and app endpoints with fake data and queries. In addition to blocking valid users, these make business logic procedures run inefficiently.
In 2020, for instance, thousands of bogus swap requests per minute were directed to the front-end web app of the Synthetix decentralized exchange. By temporarily reducing bandwidth and making the service unusable, this application layer assault locked out legitimate users. A lack of protection against spoofing input caused this crash.
Monitoring Network Traffic Patterns
The analysts can detect out-of-the-ordinary changes or spikes in transmission flow departing from baseline criteria by monitoring blockchain network traffic in real-time. One obvious indication of a volume-based DDoS flood that aims to overwhelm bandwidth is an unexpected 10-100x increase in incoming requests. Capturing metrics such as volume, frequencies, sizes, and origins is essential for effective traffic monitoring. These patterns allow us to distinguish between normal levels and prospective threats.
Analytics to Identify Abnormal Transaction Spikes
In addition to network data, keeping a close eye on transaction metrics can help find attacks aimed at blockchain protocols or applications. Quickly identifying out-of-the-ordinary fluctuations in activity indicators like transaction volumes is possible with the help of statistical analytic tools. As a result, networks can detect and report abnormally high requests designed to overwhelm computational resources by manipulating protocols or some other means. When compared to random fluctuations, analytics offers quantitative confirmation that anomalous spikes are actual attack events.
Machine Learning DDoS Detection Models
Machine learning allows for the creation of detection models by training algorithms on legitimate and malicious blockchain traffic samples. These smart technologies identify patterns in fresh, unseen data as they happen. Based on historical data, the models can detect developing DDoS attack variations using pattern recognition capabilities. Without depending entirely on human analysis, machine learning provides an automated and scalable solution for security monitoring.
Community Monitoring as an Early Warning System
Finally, community members’ attack notification crowdsourcing offers priceless qualitative intelligence to augment other detections. Because end-users are usually the ones hit most by denial-of-service disruptions, it’s important to let them report issues directly to developers so that they can respond faster. Community-powered signals confirm technical detections, speeding up the time it takes to put together protection plans and get networks back up and running faster after attacks.
There are built-in economic disincentives in many blockchains, such as transaction fees or mining puzzles, which make it more expensive for miners to create new blocks. These mechanisms, which demand legitimate proof-of-work and payment for floods of fraudulent transactions or blocks, obstruct some DDoS attacks indirectly. Nonetheless, inexpensive DDoS transactions can still overwhelm networks due to low prices.
Simplifying and Enhancing Network Protocols and Capacity
Upgrading Network Protocols and Infrastructure Capacity
Increased architectural capacity and optimized network coding protect against multiple attack vectors that aim to deplete computational resources or bandwidth. Some of these measures include increasing the capacity of pipes, making nodes more efficient, sharding databases, and using more recent protocols that are more protected from vulnerabilities. Nevertheless, to scale, it is necessary to size according to both present and future demands.
Working With ISPs and Bandwidth Providers
During distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks, blockchain operators can work with ISPs to quickly increase bandwidth and filter traffic. If you ever experience volumetric flooding, this on-demand support will help. ISPs can also block traffic from known DDoS botnets to keep unwanted files off the main network.
Geoblocking Suspicious Traffic
When administrators detect an IP range with a history of malicious conduct, they ban traffic from that range. Because of this, automated DDoS bots can be more easily contained based on their origin, geography, and usage patterns. However, geo-blocking can lead to accidental denial of service without attack correlation.
Web application firewalls and filters
Blockchain web APIs, apps, and wallet services can be protected from exploitation by aggressively filtering inputs with specific application firewalls. Attackers can stop application attacks by screening, validating, and timing out requests. Normal users won’t notice that the speed is slower. Applying rules correctly reduces the likelihood of application assaults.
Alternative Consensus Models
Modern proof-of-stake and other decentralized and incentive-based mining methods sidestep the computational burden of proof-of-work, which allows for specific mining fatigue attacks. Nevertheless, stake models present new, more intricate entry points for attackers. Hybrid models strike a balance between efficiency and security.
With the widespread adoption of cryptocurrency and decentralized applications, the blockchain ecosystem is more vulnerable to organized DDoS attacks than ever. In recent years, attacks on big networks like Solana and Manta and smaller chains have been very damaging. These attacks show how disruptive this digital plague can be.
Nevertheless, blockchain engineers demonstrate that they can counter the bandwidth bandits and safeguard the fundamental promise of secure distributed ledgers through heightened awareness, agility, and creativity. Robust defenses that can endure floods, exploits, and application assaults are emerging through sophisticated machine-learning algorithms, increased network capacity, incentive consensus models, and constant traffic monitoring.
The never-ending chase with ever-evolving cybercriminals is far from over. Still, the steady improvement of blockchain DDoS security gives hope that Web 3.0 developments have solid ground to stand. There will be fewer outages and more protection for user assets from bad actors if decentralized networks adopt tried-and-true security protocols when they enter the mainstream of sensitive applications like finance.
Blockchain pioneers can confidently keep pushing the limits of what is possible, thanks to their robust defenses based on technology and community participation. They don’t have to worry about outside threats slowing them down. Attackers on the blockchain may win some short-term battles, but strong DDoS defenses keep the road to success clear.